Content strategy: topic clusters and briefs
Pillar and cluster planning, mapping keywords to URLs, writing a brief that produces the page you planned, and preventing cannibalisation.
Pillar and cluster planning
A topic cluster is one broad pillar page and a set of focused pages that each answer a narrower question, all linked to each other. It works because it demonstrates depth on a subject rather than scattering single pages across unrelated topics.
| Layer | Role | Length | Targets |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pillar | The overview that defines the topic and routes to detail | Long, structured, one H1, many sections | The broad head term |
| Cluster page | One question answered completely | Focused, 800-2000 words | A specific long-tail phrase |
| Supporting asset | A tool, template or calculator | Varies | Link-worthy and shareable |
| Update | An existing page refreshed with new data | Same URL | Terms it already ranks for |
Cluster: DNS operations
Pillar /guides/dns primary: dns guide
Spoke /guides/dns/ttl primary: dns ttl
Spoke /guides/dns/record-types primary: dns record types
Spoke /guides/dns/email-records primary: spf dkim dmarc
Spoke /guides/dns/troubleshooting primary: dig command examples
Link rules
pillar -> every spoke, in body copy, descriptive anchor
spoke -> pillar, once, near the top
spoke -> two or three sibling spokes, only where genuinely useful- Publish the pillar first or last - either works - but plan all of it before writing any of it, or the spokes will overlap.
- One page per intent. If two planned pages would answer the same question, merge them at the planning stage, not after both are indexed.
- Leave room for updates. A plan with no maintenance budget produces a site that decays quietly.
The content brief
BRIEF: DNS TTL and caching
URL: https://example.com/guides/dns/ttl
Primary: dns ttl
Secondary: what is ttl, negative caching, ttl propagation
Intent: informational, developer troubleshooting a cutover
Audience: developer who knows DNS basics but not cache layers
Must answer
1. which layers cache a record and for how long
2. what lowering TTL does and does not fix
3. how negative caching differs (SOA minimum)
4. a safe cutover sequence with realistic timings
5. how to verify what a given resolver is serving
Must not
- repeat the record-type list from /guides/dns/record-types
- include a provider comparison table (that is a commercial page)
Links out: /guides/dns, /guides/dns/record-types, /guides/dns/troubleshooting
Success: impressions for "dns ttl" and "ttl propagation" in 8 weeksA brief that only lists keywords produces a page that reads like a keyword list. The sections that make it useful are the ones that say what must be answered, what must be excluded to avoid duplication, and how success will be judged.
Cannibalisation and updating
- Export queries for the topic from Search Console and group them by the URL that received impressions.
- If two URLs collect impressions for the same query in the same week, that is cannibalisation - the engine is unsure which page to serve.
- Decide which page is the better answer to that intent, then either merge the content into it and redirect the other, or differentiate the weaker page's angle and reduce the overlap.
- Never fix cannibalisation by adding a canonical from one live page to another that does not cover the topic; you lose the weaker page's traffic without gaining anything.
- Re-check 30 days after the change. Positions usually move before clicks do.
| Situation | Action | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Two thin pages, same intent | Merge into one | One strong page beats two weak ones |
| Old page ranking 5-15 with outdated data | Update in place, keep the URL | Preserves accumulated signals |
| Old page ranking 5-15 but the topic moved | Write a new page, redirect the old | Refreshing cannot fix a wrong answer |
| Page with traffic, no conversions | Improve the next step, not the copy | The query was satisfied; the page did its job |
| Seasonal page out of season | Keep it live, update before the season | Removing and restoring loses everything |
💡
The most reliable growth lever for an established site is updating what already ranks, not writing the next new page. Pages sitting on positions four to fifteen are already close - a better answer, current data and a clearer structure regularly moves them into the top three.
FAQ
How often should content be refreshed?
Review pages that depend on facts, prices, versions or dates at least twice a year, and after any product change. Evergreen conceptual pages can go much longer if nothing has changed.
Can one page rank for many keywords?
Yes, and that is normal. A well-built page usually collects dozens of related queries. What it cannot do is serve two different intents well - that is what needs a second page.
Related
Keyword research and search intent Site architecture, URLs and internal linking
Last refreshed 2026-09-18.